Social Media Effectiveness Indicators of Microenterprise Strategic Planning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of social media in the support of marketing mix has been gaining prominence in contemporary strategic planning. The indicators on how microenterprises can effectively benchmark their social media usage is ambiguous. This paper aims to identify possible indicators of social media effectiveness towards microenterprises strategic planning. A conceptual framework is developed based on marketing mix elements of promotion and place in identifying the possible indicators of social media effectiveness. Owner/managers of food and beverage microenterprises in the Malaysian state of Sarawak were approached to understand their Facebook promotional strategy, features in generating interest to their outlet and general outcome in supporting their marketing mix elements. Through thematic analysis, the findings indicated sales increment, customer retention and viral marketing are vital for social media effectiveness. The context of the paper is limited to microenterprises in developing market through a subjective-based strategic planning evaluation framework. Selective marketing mix elements are applied through the perspective of Food and Beverage industry in the development of the social media effectiveness indicators. The three themes from the findings: sales increment, customer retention and viral marketing could serve as the foundation for microenterprise strategic planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".