MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021425387 · doi:10.1163/9781848880429_002

Immigration and Liminality in Rawi Hage’s Cockroach

2010· book-chapter· en· W3021425387 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jesse Hutchison

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilippine History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiminalityMulticulturalismImmigrationAestheticsSociologyConventionPolitical scienceGender studiesLawArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The official policy of Canadian multiculturalism would have it that immigrants might ‘fully participate in Canadian society’ while still ‘[identifying] with the cultural heritage of their choice’. Arnold Itwaru, in his The Invention of Canada, argues that Canadian immigration narratives work to undermine the official doctrine by exposing the very paradox of such a program and, consequently, destabilising the Canadian desire for a unified multicultural nation. Rawi Hage’s recently published novel Cockroach facilitates examination of how the contemporary immigrant experience in practice reveals the flaws inherent in the ideals of Canadian multiculturalism. Hage suggests that in order for the nameless narrator to ‘fully participate in Canadian society’, which here means (among other things) getting a job and surviving, he must first begin a process of self-erasure, eliminating the parts of his heritage that exist outside of social and cultural acceptability. The narrator is, in fact, unable to blend the two possibilities suggested in Canada’s multiculturalism policy; rather he wavers between two seemingly bleak positions - the conforming exotic immigrant and the nonconforming cockroach. The narrator strives to fit into normal, legitimate, acceptable society because his very survival depends upon it. But, in order to do so, he must transform himself into someone he is not. I argue that the novel offers the concept of a liminal space between human and cockroach as a space of possibility for the immigrant. A recent convention of contemporary Canadian literature is to position characters (often nameless) within a liminal space that is specifically a generative space. Hage’s similar positioning of his own narrator is crucial to my discussion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhilippine History and CultureFrench-language works237,207