MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021474515 · doi:10.9734/bjmmr/2013/3526

Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) is a Valid Index for Routine Care in Patients with Osteoarthritis

2013· article· en· W3021474515 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alfredomaria Lurati

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Medicine and Medical Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisWOMACPhysical therapyCronbach's alphaRheumatologyVisual analogue scaleInternal medicinePsychometricsAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background RAPID3 (routine assessment of patient index data) is an arithmetic composite index of three Core Data Set, patient self-report, measures: physical function (0-3 converted to 0-10), pain (0-10), and patient global estimate (0-10) for a total of 0-30. It can be completed in the waiting room and can be calculated in only few seconds. Objectives Aim of this study was to compare RAPID3 with the Western Ontario and Mc-Master Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA) Methods patients with symptomatic knee or hip osteoarthritis as main rheumatologic diagnosis (VAS pain > 50 on a visual scale 0-100mm) according to the ACR (American College of Rheumatology) criteria and with stage 2 or 3 according to the Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic criteria were eligible. All subjects were clinically evaluated individually by an experienced rheumatologist and were asked to complete the self-report questionnaires (the original version of the WOMAC for hip or knee osteoarthritis and the RAPID3). There was no specific order in which the tests were completed; rather, each participant selected the order. Agreement between WOMAC and RAPID3 scores was estimated with rho Spearman correlation statistic. Cronbach’s alpha also was determined to evaluate the internal consistency of RAPID3 items Results 218 patients (63 males, 155 females) with hip (n=93) or knee (n=125) osteoarthritis were enrolled in daily practice clinical care during 2010-2012. Mean age (±SD) was 62±7.4 years old. Mean score was 58±8.1 for WOMAC and 7.2±1.5 for RAPID3. RAPID3 and WOMAC have shown a global correlation rho index of 0.78 (p 0.05). The Spearman’s rho was 0.78 for hip osteoarthritis (p Conclusions Up to date there’s not literature about the use of RAPID3 in patients with OA. In our study we found a strong correlation between RAPID3 and WOMAC in patients with either hip and knee OA. RAPID3 provide informative quantitative data for patient status from one visit to the next comparable to other self-reported questionnaire as WOMAC in a time sparing manner Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Medicine and Medical ResearchSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207