MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Chromosomal alterations in oligodendroglial tumors over multiple surgeries: Is progression associated with change in 1p/19q status?

2007· article· en· W3021558362 on OpenAlexaff
Brittany Campbell, Doug Horsman, John A. Maguire, Sean Young, Darko Curman, Ruichong Ma, Brian Thiessen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoss of heterozygosityMedicinePathologyOligodendroglial TumorTumor progressionOligodendrogliomaInternal medicineOncologyCancer researchBiologyGeneCancerGlioblastomaAlleleGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10577 Background: There is morphologic and genotypic heterogeneity of oligodendroglial neoplasms. Tumors with loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of 1p and/or 19q are associated with increased chemo-sensitivity and survival. Despite treatment, rates of recurrence and malignant transformation are high. The pathogenesis of treatment-resistance is unknown. We aim to determine if tumour progression is associated with a proliferation of clonagens with retention of heterozygosity (ROH) of 1p, or if progressing tumours remain 1p/19q LOH. Methods: Between 1/1/2001 and 7/31/2006, 24 patients with oligodendroglial neoplasms, and possessing serial biopsies taken at diagnosis and at progression, were identified. Using PCR amplification of multiple microsatellite markers, a total of 53 tumour specimens were available for LOH analysis of 1p and 19q; 40 were also tested for 9p and 10q. Results: At diagnosis, the median age was 34 (24–66) years and 14 were male. Using the WHO criteria, 19 tumors were Grade II oligodendrogliomas or oligoastrocytomas, and 5 were high grade. The most common genomic status was 19q LOH (88%); 54% had 1p LOH. Of the 13 primary biopsies with 1p LOH, 11 had 19q LOH, 1 had 19q ROH, and 1 was 19q non-informative. A further 2 primaries were mixed 1p LOH/ROH, and 9 were 1p ROH. At progression, 10 of 11 patients with 1p/19q LOH had persistent co-deletion. The patient with 1p LOH and 19q ROH at diagnosis, had 1p/19q LOH at progression. Of the mixed 1p primaries, 1 was 1p ROH, and the other remained mixed LOH/ROH at progression. 8 of 9 primaries with 1p ROH remained 1p ROH. There was also little heterogeneity of 9p and 10q between primary and progressive tumours. Using Kaplain-Meier analysis, mean overall survival (OS) for the group was 102 (95% CI: 77–127) months. Mean progression-free survival was 52 (95% CI: 33–72) months. OS was not statistically significant between patients with 1p LOH and 1p ROH primary tumours. Conclusions: 91% of repeat biopsies of oligodendroglial tumors, demonstrated persistent 1p/19q LOH. Therefore, progression of 1p/19q LOH primary tumours is not due to a proliferating sub-group of chemo-resistant, 1p ROH clonagens. We propose that additional mutations contribute to this aggressive phenotype. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→