Factors affecting the effectiveness of rehabilitation in patients in the acute period of cerebral stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To study the factors, affecting the effectiveness of acute period rehabilitation in patients after ischemic stroke (IS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We examined 72 patients (average age 63.8 ± 1.3 years) in the acute period of IS who were treated in the neurological department for patients with acute cerebrovascular accident of the State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare of the Republic of Bashkortostan «Emergency Hospital» (Ufa). All patients underwent clinical, instrumental and laboratory examination. The following scales were used: NIHSS, Rankin, Barthel, Rivermead, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Spielberg - Hanin situational and personal anxiety scale, Beck's Depression Inventory, A.M. Vain questionnaire for assessment of the severity of autonomic dysfunction, T. Ehlers test and A.M. Schubert's method of determination of the state of the motivational sphere and risk preparedness. Assessment of the rehabilitation potential was carried out by analyzing the data of the Rehabilitation List. According to the severity of neurological deficit, the patients were divided into 2 groups: 38 (52.7%) patients with mild IS were included in the Group 1 and 34 (47.2%) patients with moderate IS - in Group 2. RESULTS: By the end of the treatment, significant changes in the number of patients with cognitive and depressive disorders, qualitative changes in the levels of personal and situational anxiety in the direction of their reduction were registered. In the vast majority of patients in both groups at the stages of treatment, one or another degree of autonomic nervous system dysfunction was found. Most patients (82.9%) at the beginning of the treatment had an average and high degree of motivation to achieve success in treatment, along with a low and medium level of risk preparedness, which is characteristic of a person aimed at success. According to the complex of factors, 78% of patients had an average and high level of rehabilitation potential. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive and individual approach to the correction of pathological disorders in patients in the acute period of IS, taking into account the rehabilitation potential, is the key to the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment at the stages of rehabilitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".