OR15-02 Mental Health Implications and Determinants of When Youth Present to a Gender Clinic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background/Aims: Gender incongruent (GI) youth experience high rates of mental health comorbidities. While gender-affirming medical care (GAMC) provides psychological benefit, GI youth often present to care at older ages. The goals of this study were to 1) assess the relationship between age at presentation to GAMC and rates of mental health comorbidities, 2) identify factors influencing when youth present to GAMC, and 3) determine whether older presenting youth face more barriers to care. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional chart review of patients presenting to GAMC. Subjects were classified a priori as younger presenting youth (YPY): <15 years of age at presentation or older presenting youth (OPY): > 15 years of age. Self-reported rates of mental health comorbidities and medication use were compared between groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify determinants of mental health comorbidities. Covariates included pubertal stage at presentation, social transition status, and assigned sex. Next, we performed a sequential exploratory mixed-methods study. Factors influencing age at presentation to GAMC were explored through 24 semi-structured interviews with OPY, YPY, and their caregivers (OPY-C and YPY-C). Thematic analysis identified themes with differential representation between OPY/OPY-C and YPY/YPY-C. From these themes, a questionnaire was designed and distributed to youth and caregivers presenting for follow-up. Responses were compared between OPY and YPY and between OPY-C and YPY-C. Results: Of 300 youth, there were184 OPY and 116 YPY. Upon presentation, more OPY than YPY reported a diagnosis of depression (46% vs. 30%), had self-harmed (40% vs. 28%), had considered suicide (52% vs. 40%), had attempted suicide (17% vs. 9%), and required psychoactive medications (36% vs. 23%), all p < .05. After controlling for covariates, late puberty (Tanner stage 4 or 5) was associated with depressive disorders (OR 5.49 [95% CI: 1.14, 26.32]) and anxiety disorders (OR 4.18 [95% CI: 1.22, 14.49]) while older age remained associated only with psychoactive medication use (OR 1.31 [95% CI: 1.05, 1.63]). Six themes were identified from interviews that influenced age at first clinic visit, including individual, environmental, and healthcare system factors. 101/152 youth and 102/147 caregivers completed questionnaires. While OPY/OPY-C did not endorse more barriers to care than YPY/YPY-C, more OPY than YPY had religious families (54% vs 28%, p=.01) while more YPY than OPY had LGBTQ+ family members (46% vs. 20%, p=.006). Conclusions: Older age and late pubertal stage are associated with worse mental health among GI youth presenting to GAMC. Our findings emphasize the importance of timely access to GAMC for GI youth and highlight familial environment as a factor that influences when youth present to gender-affirmative care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".