Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Functional tremor is the most common presentation of functional movement disorders and can occur in isolation or together with other functional symptoms, including other abnormal movements. The diagnosis of functional tremor is based on positive features on history, examination, and, if necessary, neurophysiological studies. Historical features include: sudden onset, a preceding physical event or injury, variability in severity with or without remission, variability in affected body parts, the presence of other somatic symptoms, and a history of failed therapeutic trials. Positive signs on examination include: variability in the frequency, direction, and distribution of the tremor; clear coherence in the different body parts affected; reduction or elimination of the tremor with distraction; and tremor amplification with attention, entrainability, suggestibility, and the presence of co-contraction. Neurophysiological studies include electromyography and accelerometry and can be helpful to make a laboratory-supported diagnosis when the clinical picture is less clear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it