MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3021698633 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1500

SUN-636 Gaps in Quality of Delivery of Post-Partum Care in Preconception Counselling for Pregnant Women with Pre-Existing Diabetes at a Large Academic Tertiary Centre

2020· article· en· W3021698633 on OpenAlexaffabout
Minan Abbas, Denice S. Feig, Geetha Mukerji

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyObstetricsDiabetes mellitusAuditType 2 diabetesPopulationFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Women with pre-existing diabetes are at increased risk of serious adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with the general maternity population including congenital anomaly, stillbirth and neonatal death. The 2018 Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines (DC CPG) on Diabetes in Pregnancy recommend that women with pre-existing diabetes are provided with postpartum and preconception counseling by their diabetes healthcare team, as this is associated with improved maternal and fetal outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of physican counselling of post-partum management and pre conception advice for women with pre-existing diabetes who receive their intrapartum care at Mount Sinai Hospital Diabetes in Pregnancy Clinic in Toronto Ontario. METHODS: Eligible patients were pregnant women with pre-existing Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes who were followed in pregnancy until their 6 weeks postpartum clinic visit. Consecutive baseline chart review of patients between June 2018 - June 2019 was performed to audit documentation of physician counselling of DC CPG recommendations at the 6 week post-partum visit. Key components of the recommendations included: 1) targeting an HbA1c of <7% pre-pregnancy, 2) folic acid supplementation and neural tube defect prevention, 3) weight management and optimization of BMI, 4) contraceptive measures and family planning, 5) information regarding outcomes and risks for mother and baby 6) yearly retinal exam. RESULTS: Results of our chart review found that 42% (n=50) of women with pre-existing diabetes who received their intrapartum care at our clinic returned for their 6 week postpartum visit between June 2018-June 2019. Audit of the 6 week post-partum clinic note found that less than 20% of women had physician documentation of counselling on two or more key components of the DC CPG recommendations (1-6). CONCLUSION: There is a large gap in women attending postpartum appointments and there are significant gaps in physician documentation of counselling among women with pre-existing diabetes. Further analysis will be conducted in order to determine if there is a patient knowledge gap regarding counselling recommendations and a quality improvement project will be undertaken to close this gap.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine Society→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→