MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3021748525 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2006.05.1623

P3–353: Orexinergic projections to acetylcholinesterase neurons in normal and Alzheimer forebrain

2006· article· en· W3021748525 on OpenAlexaff
Sultan Darvesh, David A. Hopkins, Marleen de Groot, G. Andrew Reid, Benjamin Rusak

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasal forebrainOrexinCholinergic neuronNeuroscienceCholinergicCholine acetyltransferaseBiologyForebrainLateral hypothalamusNeuroanatomyInternal medicineEndocrinologyPsychologyNeuropeptideMedicineCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cholinergic and orexinergic neurotransmitter systems are both involved in arousal and sleep–wakefulness cycles. In Alzheimer's disease (AD), there is significant loss of cholinergic neurons that leads to salient cognitive and behavioural symptoms. Patients with AD have disturbances in sleep patterns that can cause significant behavioural disturbances leading to patient and care–giver stress. In order to understand possible mechanism(s) of sleep disturbance in these patients, we examined the relationship of orexinergic projections to cholinergic neurons in normal forebrain and in AD. Immunoreactivity for orexin A and B was assessed in human brain from 4 control subjects without neuropathology (ages: 70–77) and from 4 clinically and neuropathologically confirmed AD patients (ages: 70–92). Goat polyclonal antibodies raised against human orexin A or orexin B (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used and the immunohistochemical reaction was visualized using the avidin–biotin–diaminobenzidine method. Sections were also stained for acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and Nissl substance. In both control and AD brains, orexin–positive cell bodies were found in the lateral, perifornical and medial regions of the hypothalamus. In the thalamus, orexinergic projections specifically target magnocellular cell groups that also receive dense cholinergic innervation (Heckers et al., 19920 and are AChE–positive (Darvesh and Hopkins, 2003). These include magnocellular cell groups of the medial dorsal, intralaminar and cucullar nuclei as well as the limitans–suprageniculate complex. Orexin–positive axons were in close proximity to large, hyperchromic neurons, many of which stain for AChE. Similarly, in the basal forebrain, dense orexinergic projections selectively targeted the large, hyperchromic cholinergic neurons of the nucleus basalis, as well as neurons of the nucleus of the diagonal band of Broca, most of which were also AChE–positive. These cell groups project to the cerebral cortex and subcortical forebrain structures such as the hippocampal formation and amygdala. The distribution of orexin in the human forebrain is consistent with their role in arousal and the regulation of the sleep–wake cycle. Qualitative observations suggest that orexinergic innervation may be altered in AD brains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicSleep and Wakefulness Research→French-language works237,207→