MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021794560 · doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1745942

Peers, Near-Peers, and Outreach Staff to Build Solidarity in Global HIV Research With Adolescents

2020· letter· en· W3021794560 on OpenAlexaff
Mary A. Ott, Edith Apondi, Katherine R. MacDonald, Lonnie Embleton, Julie Thorne, Juddy Wachira, Allan Kamanda, Paula Braitstein

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Bioethics · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsOutreachSolidarityHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PsychologySocial psychologyMedicineFamily medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the global HIV epidemic, solidarity-building approaches to engage adolescents in HIV prevention research are not just advisable but are imperative. In low resource settings, research-driven inte...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.073
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.087
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0730.087
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.011
Open science0.0040.026
Research integrity0.0030.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of BioethicsSame topicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthFrench-language works237,207