Augmented Design of DC/DC Modular Multilevel Converter Improving Efficiency and Reducing Number of SMs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an augmented design method for the dc/dc modular multilevel converter considering the control (e.g., the phase difference between arms ac voltages) and hardware aspects (e.g., type and number of submodules (SMs)) of the converter simultaneously. The proposed augmented design determines the number of SMs and their types (e.g., half- or full-bridge) in each arm and phase difference between arms ac voltages that minimize the total converter losses. Computationally-efficient analytical and semi-analytical methods are proposed to estimate the conduction and switching losses. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, the losses obtained from the proposed analytical and semi-analytical methods are compared with the results of the detailed converter switching model implemented in the Simulink environment. The performance of the converter designed by the augmented approach is compared with the conventional topology in terms of total losses and the number of SMs. The comparative study showed that the proposed design method yields a converter with lower total losses and number of SMs. Moreover, the proposed design method extends the operation regime of the converter, especially when the dc links voltage levels are close; this extension is not possible in the conventional modular dc/dc converter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".