MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B63: Immune gene expression profiling of acute myeloid leukemia identifies predictors of survival and actionable targets for treatment

2020· article· en· W3021897149 on OpenAlexaff
Sergio Rutella, Jayakumar Vadakekolathu, Tressa Hood, Stephen Reeder, Sarah Warren, Patrick Danaher, Jan Davidson‐Moncada, Alessandra Cesano, Joseph Beechem, Sarah K. Tasian, Mark D. Minden

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemMyeloidImmunotherapyImmune checkpointCancer immunotherapyBiologyGene expression profilingTumor microenvironmentImmunologyCancer researchInnate immune systemMedicineGeneGene expressionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by clonal expansion of poorly differentiated myeloid precursors, resulting in impaired hematopoiesis and often bone marrow (BM) failure. The general therapeutic approach in patients with AML has not changed substantially in more than 30 years. Investigation of new strategies, including immunotherapy, remains a priority. Tumor phenotypes are dictated not only by major oncogene drivers, but also by the tumor immunologic microenvironment (TIME) which is inherently immunosuppressive, is equipped to hamper effector T-cell function and includes immune and inflammatory cells, soluble mediators such as interferon (IFN)-gamma and extracellular matrix components. Herein, we profiled the TIME of AML to identify gene signatures that are reflective of general immune status and predictive of antileukemia immune potential. Methods: We used the hybridization-based nCounter® system (NanoString Technologies®, Seattle, WA) and the RNA Pan-Cancer Immune Profiling PanelTM to analyze BM aspirates from 290 adults and 40 children with newly diagnosed, nonpromyelocytic AML. Data were normalized to a set of reference genes and log2-transformed for bioinformatics analysis. The clinical relevance of the association between immune gene signatures and patient outcome was further validated in silico using publicly available cancer transcriptomic datasets (The Cancer Genome Atlas; TCGA). Results: We identified distinct sets of co-expressed genes corresponding to innate immunity, adaptive immunity and IFN-gamma signaling. BM samples with IFN-gamma-dominant gene expression profiles showed up-regulation of actionable immune checkpoints, such as B7-H3, PD-L1 and CTLA-4. A set of 4 differentially expressed immune genes between children and adults with AML (FDR<0.005) was associated with adverse cytogenetic features, leukemia relapse and shorter patient survival, and also stratified survival in the TCGA cohort of adult patients with AML. Finally, all four genes were amplified, deleted or mutated in 7% of 51,175 TCGA solid tumors, with the highest frequency of mutations being detected in primary CNS lymphoma (40%) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (25%). Conclusions: Our study identified distinct immune gene programs in the TIME of patients with newly diagnosed AML. From a translational standpoint, immune-enriched and IFN-gamma-dominant AMLs may benefit from immune checkpoint blockade and from new immunotherapy approaches, including dual-affinity T-cell redirecting antibodies targeting CD123. Grant support: John and Lucille van Geest Foundation, UK; Roger Counter Foundation, UK; Qatar National Research Fund (#NPRP8-2297-3-494). Citation Format: Sergio Rutella, Jayakumar Vadakekolathu, Tressa Hood, Stephen Reeder, Sarah E. Warren, Patrick Danaher, Jan Davidson-Moncada, Alessandra Cesano, Joseph M. Beechem, Sarah K. Tasian, Mark D. Minden. Immune gene expression profiling of acute myeloid leukemia identifies predictors of survival and actionable targets for treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2018 Nov 27-30; Miami Beach, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2020;8(4 Suppl):Abstract nr B63.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207