Magnetic Susceptibility Associates With Dopaminergic Deficits and Cognition in Parkinson's Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between nigrostriatal magnetic susceptibility and dopamine transporter abnormality and their associations with behavioral and cognitive impairments in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: I-N-v-fluoropropyl-2b-carbomethoxy-3b-(4-iodophenyl) nortropane single-photon emission computed tomography (dopamine transporter measure). We subdivided the striatum into the putamen, caudate nucleus, and nucleus accumbens and measured the nigrostriatal QSM values and dopamine transporter-specific binding ratios using an atlas-based approach. RESULTS: The patients with PD had higher QSM values in the substantia nigra and subdivisions of the striatum than did the healthy controls. The striatal dopamine transporter-specific binding ratios were not correlated with the QSM values of the substantia nigra but were inversely correlated with those of the striatum (putamen, r = -0.478, P = 0.009; caudate nucleus, r = -0.462, P = 0.011). The QSM values of the putamen were positively correlated with motor parkinsonism scores (Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, r = 0.505, P = 0.003), and those of the caudate nucleus were negatively correlated with cognitive impairment scores (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, r = -0.525, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that striatal iron accumulations were correlated with dopaminergic deficits and neurophysiological signs in patients with PD, highlighting the potential of QSM as an auxiliary biomarker for parkinsonism and cognitive dysfunction. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".