An Epigenetic Signature for Within-Generational Plasticity of a Reef Fish to Ocean Warming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elevated temperature can have detrimental effects on the physiological performance of many marine organisms. However, phenotypic plasticity may enable some populations to maintain their performance under stressful conditions. Two populations of the coral reef fish, Acanthochromis polyacanthus from the Great Barrier Reef have shown differing capacities for thermal plasticity - the Heron Island population restored aerobic scope within one generation at a higher temperature, whereas the Palm Island population restored aerobic scope only when two generations were exposed to warmer conditions. We recently discovered an epigenetic signature associated with transgenerational plasticity in the Palm Island population. Here, we aimed to determine if epigenetic changes are also associated with the within-generational plasticity in the Heron Island population and, if so, how this epigenetic signature compares to the Palm Island transgenerational epigenome. By sequencing and analyzing the genome-wide DNA methylome of fish reared at control (+0 °C) or elevated temperatures (+1.5 and +3 °C) since early life, we identified 480 differentially methylated genomic regions and 372 adjacent protein-coding genes associated with within-generational plasticity in the Heron Island population. Functions related to insulin, cardiovascular capacity, development, and heat response were significantly enriched in differentially methylated genes, suggesting that these functions are the core mechanisms for within-generational restoration of aerobic scope. Comparison to the differentially methylated genes identified from F2 Palm Island population revealed little overlap of genes and enriched functions, indicating that distinct genetic toolkits may be used for within- and between-generational plasticity to ocean warming in the same species from different latitudes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".