Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forest/wildland fires are natural disasters that create a significant threat to the communities living in the vicinity of the forested landscape. To minimize the risk concerning resiliency of those urban communities to forest fires, my overall objective was to develop primarily remote sensing (RS)-based models assessing potential risks at the wildland-urban interface (WUI) and making predictions of danger conditions in the environs forest/vegetation. I investigated the risks associated with WUI for the Fort McMurray community and danger conditions in the northern part of Alberta, Canada. For developing the risk modelling framework at WUI, I employed primarily a WorldView-2 satellite image acquired on June 06, 2016. I estimated structural damages due to the devastating 2016 Horse River wildland fire (HRF) that entered the community on May 03, 2016. Besides, I analyzed the presence of vegetation at the WUI to identify the associated risks according to the FireSmart Canada guidelines. My remote sensing-based estimates of the number of structural damages identified a strong linear relationship (i.e., r2 value of 0.97) with the ground-based estimates. Besides, all damaged structures were found associated with the existence of vegetation within the 30m buffer/priority zone of the WUI. It was revealed that approximately 30% of the areas of the WUI were vulnerable due to the presence of vegetation, in which approximately 7% were burned during the 2016 HRF event that led the structural damages. In addition, I developed a new medium-term (i.e., four days) model to forecast forest fire danger conditions using RS-derived biophysical variables of vegetation. I primarily employed Terra MODIS (moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer)-derived four-day composites of daily surface temperature, normalized difference vegetation index and normalized difference water index. The model was able to detect about 75% of the fire events in the top two danger classes (i.e., very high and high) when evaluated with the historical ground-based forest fire occurrences during the fire seasons of 2015–2017. Besides, the model was able to predict the 2016 HRF event with about 67% agreement. Finally, I developed an operational near real-time (NRT) model to forecast forest fire danger conditions for a day to the next 8 days. Here, I employed Terra MODIS-acquired NRT data from NASA's LANCE (land, atmosphere near real-time capability for earth observing system), where data are made available to the public domain within 2.5 hours of satellite observation. The NRT model was successful in producing forecasted forest fire danger maps at any given time. These developed risk/forecast models would be very useful for the stakeholders in the forest fires management strategies of saving life, property, and community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".