MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022160656 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000000974

Prevalence of Optic Disc Drusen in Young Patients With Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A 10-Year Retrospective Study

2020· article· en· W3022160656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnterior ischemic optic neuropathyMedicineOphthalmologyOptic neuropathyOptic nerveRetrospective cohort studyDrusenSurgeryRetinal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) in young patients (age ≤50) accounts for a minority of all cases of NAION and is more highly associated with crowding of the optic nerves and bilateral involvement than NAION in older patients. Optic disc drusen (ODD) are likewise associated with crowded optic nerves and are located in the prelaminar optic nerve head where they could contribute to NAION pathogenesis. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of ODD in the eyes of young NAION patients using modern imaging methods and to compare it to the baseline 1.8%-2.0% prevalence of ODD in the general population. METHODS: In this retrospective study, all young NAION patients (ages 18-50 years, inclusive) seen in 2 tertiary care neuro-ophthalmology clinics (in London, Canada and Copenhagen, Denmark) in the ten-year interval between April 1, 2009, and March 31, 2019, were identified and their medical charts reviewed. Patients were included in the study if ODD were diagnosed by any method (including ophthalmoscopy, ultrasound [US], fundus autofluorescence [FAF], computed tomography [CT], or any optical coherence tomography [OCT] method), or if ODD were excluded by enhanced-depth imaging OCT (EDI-OCT) using the ODD Studies (ODDS) Consortium protocol. The presence or absence of ODD was recorded for each eye. RESULTS: There were 37 eligible patients (74 eyes). Mean age of NAION onset was 38.5 ± 10.0 years, and 23 patients (62%) were men. Patients had undergone the following methods of ODD detection: ophthalmoscopy (37 patients), EDI-OCT (36 patients), FAF (31 patients), US (9 patients), and CT orbits (8 patients). We found a prevalence of ODD of 56.7% in NAION-affected patients and 53.3% in NAION-affected eyes. Only 35.9% of ODD were visible on ophthalmoscopy. Twenty of 21 ODD patients (95.2%) had bilateral ODD. Age of onset and sex did not differ significantly between the ODD-positive group and the ODD-negative group. EDI-OCT outperformed any combination of ophthalmoscopy, US, FAF, and CT at detecting ODD. CONCLUSION: ODD were found with much higher prevalence in young patients with NAION than in the general population and were usually bilateral and buried. ODD may contribute to NAION pathogenesis by exacerbating an underlying compartment syndrome in the crowded "disc at risk." EDI-OCT may be the best imaging modality for ODD detection in future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it