Advances in the cytogenetics of Annonaceae, the case of <i>Annona cherimola</i> L.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Annonaceae represent the largest extant family among the early divergent angiosperms. Despite the long-standing interest in its evolutionary and taxonomic aspects, cytogenetic studies on this family remain extremely few even on economically important species. With this study, we realized a detailed characterization of the chromosomes of Annona cherimola (2n = 14) by a combination of in situ hybridization techniques, fluorochrome banding, and karyomorphological analysis. FISH revealed that 45S and 5S rDNA sites are co-localized in correspondence to the secondary constrictions of the SAT-chromosome pair. Some hypotheses on the organization of the linked 45S and 5S rDNA repeats have been made. FISH with Arabidopsis-type telomeric arrays demonstrated that the A. cherimola telomeres are constituted by TTTAGGG sequences and that they are exclusively localized at the extremities of chromosomes. An insight into the chromosome structure of A. cherimola was obtained by the self-GISH procedure which revealed highly repeated DNA sequences localized in the centromeric regions of all chromosomes. The correspondence of s-GISH signals with DAPI banding suggests that these sequences are the principal component of the centromeric heterochromatin of this species. The karyotype of A. cherimola here described is proposed as the basic reference karyotype for successive investigations in Annonaceae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".