MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022440178 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.2183

MON-LB115 Ready-To-Use Glucagon for the Prevention of Exercise-Induced Hypoglycemia in a Clinical Research Setting

2020· article· en· W3022440178 on OpenAlexaff
Ronnie Aronson, Michael C. Riddell, Nicole Close, Khaled Junaidi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsLMC Diabetes & Endocrinology (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboHypoglycemiaAerobic exerciseHeart rateCrossover studyDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineInsulinAdverse effectBasal (medicine)GlucagonPhysical therapyEndocrinologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract OBJECTIVE: A mini-dose of a novel ready-to-use liquid stable glucagon (RTUG; Xeris Pharmaceuticals) was evaluated for the prevention of exercise-induced hypoglycemia (EIH) during and after moderate-to-high intensity aerobic exercise, in both a clinical research center (CRC) and outpatient setting. The observations from the CRC setting are reported here. METHOD: A Phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, two-treatment, crossover study enrolled 48 adults with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, to evaluate the efficacy of pre-exercise RTUG in addition to standard of care basal insulin rate reduction. The CRC setting included 2 separate daytime exercise sessions 2 to 28 days apart. At 5 minutes prior to each exercise session, subjects reduced their basal rate of insulin infusion by 50% and self-administered placebo or RTUG 150 micrograms (μg) before performing 45 minutes of moderate-to-high intensity, aerobic exercise with a target of 80% maximum heart rate. Blood glucose was measured before, during, and after exercise to evaluate the incidence and severity of hypoglycemia. RESULT: Of the 45 subjects (93.8%) that completed both exercise sessions in the CRC, EIH occurred more in placebo (n=8) compared to RTUG (n=1). More subjects used glucose tablets to treat EIH in placebo (n=4) compared to RTUG (n=1). Placebo-treated participants consumed 7-fold greater glucose tablets during and after exercise, and experienced more episodes of post-exercise hyperglycemia (blood glucose >250 mg/dL), compared to RTUG. Treatment emergent adverse events with RTUG were comparable to placebo. RTUG 150 μg caused no edema, erythema, nor injection site reactions. RTUG was safe and well tolerated and no serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION:RTUG 150 μg adequately maintained euglycemia during and following prolonged, continuous, moderate-to-high intense aerobic exercise in the controlled CRC setting. When used prior to moderate-to-high intensity aerobic exercise, RTUG may reduce exercise-induced hypoglycemia in adults with T1D. These findings support the continued evaluation in the outpatient setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.211
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207