MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022447557 · doi:10.1136/spcare-2020-pcc.216

196 A clinical audit of use of octreotide in the management of inoperable malignant bowel obstruction at a large cancer centre

2020· article· en· W3022447557 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Palfrey, Vandana Vora

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOctreotideMedicineBowel obstructionNauseaVomitingGastroenterologyInternal medicineSomatostatinSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Octreotide is a somatostatin analogue used to reduce gastric and intestinal secretions therefore helping to improve symptoms of nausea and vomiting. There is mixed evidence for the use of octreotide however in both local guidelines and the Palliative Care Formulary 6 it is considered second line for the treatment of vomiting and managing secretions in malignant bowel obstruction with hyoscine butylbromide as first line. Objectives 1. To gain insight into the scale of prescribing of octreotide for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction in a tertiary cancer centre. 2. To compare the prescribing practices for octreotide in inoperable malignant bowel obstruction to those outlined in the local and national guidance. Methods A retrospective audit of the electronic notes and online prescriptions for inpatients prescribed octreotide for inoperable malignant bowel obstruction over a one-year period. A total of 17 patients. Audit standards: The patient has been prescribed hyoscine butyl bromide prior to being prescribed octreotide The patient has been started on a dose of octreotide between 300–600 mcg/24hrs The patient has not been prescribed a dose of octreotide greater than 1500 mcg/24hrs The patient has a clearly documented indication for the use of octreotide. Results Only 41% patients had hyoscine butyl bromide prescribed prior to being prescribed octreotide. 100% patients received the recommended starting dose of octreotide. No patients received octreotide received a dose greater than 1500 mcg/24hrs. 71% patients had a specific indication documented in the notes Conclusions There are relatively few prescriptions for octreotide despite the audit data coming from a large cancer centre. Prescriptions generally follow the guidelines however documentation of indication and reason for divergence from the guideline needs improving. Recommendations Consider using standardised documentation for when starting octreotide including indication, other medications concurrently prescribed, dietician involvement and NG tube placement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicIntestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsFrench-language works237,207