MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022510125 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdaa053

Expression profiling of the adhesion G protein-coupled receptor GPR133 (ADGRD1) in glioma subtypes

2020· article· en· W3022510125 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Joshua D. Frenster, Michael Kader, Scott Kamen, James Sun, Luis Chiriboga, Jonathan Serrano, Devin Bready, Danielle Golub, Niklas Ravn-Boess, Gabriele Stephan, Sylvia C. Kurz, Rajan Jain, Christopher Y. Park, David Fenyö, Ines Liebscher, Torsten Schöneberg, Giselle R. Wiggin, Robert H. Newman, Matt Barnes, John K. Dickson, Douglas J. MacNeil, Xinyan Huang, Nadim Shohdy, Matija Snuderl, David Zagzag, Dimitris G. Placantonakis

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthFriedberg Charitable FoundationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNew York State Stem Cell Science
KeywordsGliomaIsocitrate dehydrogenaseBiologyMalignancyImmunohistochemistryIDH1Cancer researchBrain tumorPathologyMutantMedicineGeneEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Glioma is a family of primary brain malignancies with limited treatment options and in need of novel therapies. We previously demonstrated that the adhesion G protein-coupled receptor GPR133 (ADGRD1) is necessary for tumor growth in adult glioblastoma, the most advanced malignancy within the glioma family. However, the expression pattern of GPR133 in other types of adult glioma is unknown. METHODS: We used immunohistochemistry in tumor specimens and non-neoplastic cadaveric brain tissue to profile GPR133 expression in adult gliomas. RESULTS: We show that GPR133 expression increases as a function of WHO grade and peaks in glioblastoma, where all tumors ubiquitously express it. Importantly, GPR133 is expressed within the tumor bulk, as well as in the brain-infiltrating tumor margin. Furthermore, GPR133 is expressed in both isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type and mutant gliomas, albeit at higher levels in IDH wild-type tumors. CONCLUSION: The fact that GPR133 is absent from non-neoplastic brain tissue but de novo expressed in glioma suggests that it may be exploited therapeutically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology AdvancesSame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207