SUN-930 A Case of Acromegaly Secondary to Ectopic Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone (GHRH) Secretion from a Bronchial Neuroendocrine Tumour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A Case of Acromegaly Secondary to Ectopic Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone (GHRH) Secretion from a Bronchial Neuroendocrine Tumour Background Acromegaly due to ectopic GHRH secretion is a rare disorder and only accounts for less than 1% of all cases of acromegaly. Case We present the case of a 42-year old female with acromegaly from a bronchial neuroendocrine tumour (NET) secreting GHRH. The patient presented with gradual onset of dyspnea and wheezing. Subsequent imaging (chest X-ray, CT chest) revealed a large left-sided thoracic mass. Bronchoscopy was performed and a biopsy was taken from the mass. Initial histological examination reported small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Therefore, she underwent chemoradiotherapy. The patient was concurrently experiencing increased digital girth, weight gain, and enlarged tongue and was therefore referred to our endocrinology clinic for evaluation of acromegaly. Investigations revealed normal ACTH, markedly elevated IGF-1 (1031 μg/L, normal 63–215 μg/L), and non-suppressed GH levels following a 75g oral glucose tolerance test. The remainder of the pituitary panel, including TSH, prolactin, FSH, LH were all normal. An MRI sella showed a completely normal pituitary and pineal gland with no evidence of brain metastasis. She thus met clinical and biochemical criteria for acromegaly but a pituitary source could not be identified. Given her history, a paraneoplastic process or ectopic GHRH-producing tumour was suspected. Further workup showed a significantly elevated circulating GHRH levels of 73 pg/mL (normal 5 – 18 pg/mL). Subsequently, a second pathologist with expertise in NETs reviewed the same biopsy specimen. The specimen was found to be a GHRH-producing well differentiated pulmonary NET with a Ki67 index of 1.5%, and thus not a SCLC. Furthermore, a somatostatin receptor scintigraphy study was done which showed evidence of a somatostatin avid receptor rich lesion in the lung, corresponding to the known tumour. Thus, what initially appeared to be a SCLC was subsequently found to be a GHRH-secreting NET, illustrating the challenges of diagnosing these rare tumours. She was treated with intramuscular sandostatin 20mg q28days and then underwent a left pneumonectomy, resulting in biochemical resolution of her acromegaly (IGF-1 219 μg/L). Genetic testing for MEN1 was also completed as there is an association between ectopic GHRH NETs and MEN-1; however, genetic testing revealed no pathogenic variants and exon deletions or duplications suggestive of MEN-1. Learning points Diagnosis of acromegaly due to ectopic GHRH secretion requires high clinical suspicion by the treating clinicians (e.g., endocrinologist, oncologist) as well as review of histology by expert pathologists. Our case highlights that ectopic GHRH secretion is a rare but important cause of acromegaly, which should always be suspected when a clear pituitary cause is not identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".