Biomechanical Response under Stress-Controlled Tension-Tension Fatigue of a Novel Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Intramedullary Nail for Femur Fractures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metallic intramedullary nails are the “gold standard” implant for repairing femur shaft fractures. However, their rigidity may eliminate axial micromotion at the fracture (causing delayed healing) and they may carry too much load relative to the femur (causing “stress shielding”). Consequently, some researchers have proposed fiber-reinforced composite nails, but only one evaluated cyclic fatigue performance. Therefore, this study assessed the cyclic fatigue response of a carbon fiber/epoxy nail with a novel ply stacking sequence of [02/-45/452/-45/0/-45/452/-452/452/-45/902] previously developed by the present authors. Nails were cyclically loaded in tension-tension at 5 Hz with a stress ratio of R=0.1 from 30% - 85% of the material's ultimate tensile strength (UTS). Thermographic stress analysis, rather than conventional fatigue testing, was used to obtain high cycle fatigue strength (HCFS), below which the nail can be cyclically loaded indefinitely without damage. Also, the mechanical test machine's built-in load cell and an extensometer were used to create stress-strain curves, from which the change in static EO and dynamic E* moduli were obtained. Results showed that HCFS was 70.3% of UTS (or about 283 MPa), while EO and E* remained at 42 GPa without any dRegradation during testing. The current nail shows potential for clinical use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".