MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022781094 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2991381

Load-Aware Energy Efficient Adaptive Large Scale Antenna System

2020· article· en· W3022781094 on OpenAlexaff
Wahyu Pramudito, Emad Alsusa, Arafat Al‐Dweik, Khairi Ashour Hamdi, Daniel K. C. So, Thomas L. Marzetta

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsComputer scienceAntenna (radio)Efficient energy useTransmitterQuality of serviceConstraint (computer-aided design)Energy (signal processing)WirelessComputer networkElectronic engineeringReal-time computingTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an adaptive large scale antenna system (ALSAS) for enhancing energy efficiency in low density wireless network scenarios. The proposed ALSAS comprises of two stages, a novel adaptive discontinuous transmission (ADTx) stage and an antenna array optimization (AAO) one. The basic idea is to utilize prior knowledge of the users' quality of service (QoS) requirements as well as precoding selection in the ADTx stage to maximize the transmitter hibernation periods subject to a certain complexity constraint. In the AAO stage, further power saving is achieved by reducing the number of active antenna elements subject to a certain QoS requirement. It is shown that, relative to conventional large scale antenna system (LSAS), the proposed ALSAS system achieves significant energy efficiency improvements under various scenarios. The results show that the proposed technique can provide energy efficiency improvement between 125% and 1124% in the suburban scenario, and between 196% and 952% in the rural scenario. It is also demonstrated that for rural environments with relatively small short inter-site-distance (ISD) values, ALSAS can provide up to 500% power saving for the fixed bit rate requirement case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207