An Investigation of Halogen Bonding as a Structure-Directing Interaction in Dithiadiazolyl Radicals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The preparation and characterization of the halo-functionalized dithiadiazolyl radicals p -XC 6 F 4 CNSSN (X = Br ( 1 ) or I ( 2 )) are described. Compound 1 is trimorphic. The previously reported phase 1α ( Z ′ = 1) comprises monomeric radicals, whereas 1β comprises a mixture of one cis-oid π*−π* dimer and one monomer ( Z ′ = 3), and 1γ exhibits a single cis-oid dimer ( Z ′ = 2) in the asymmetric unit. We have only been able to isolate a single polymorph of 2, isomorphous with 1α . Both the bromo and iodo groups in 1 and 2 promote sigma-hole type interactions of the type C–X···N (X = Br, I), reflecting the increasing strength of this interaction for the heavier halo-derivatives. An analysis of the intermolecular forces is made using dispersion corrected density functional theory (DFT) (UM06-2X-D3/LACV3P*) and compared to a unified pair potential model (UNI) embodied in the crystallographic software Mercury. While there is a correlation between DFT and UNI force-field models, there are some discrepancies, although both reveal that a number of intermolecular contacts beyond the sum of the van der Waals radii are significant (>5 kJ mol –1 ). A natural bond order analysis of the intermolecular interactions reveals lone pair donation from the heterocyclic N atom to C–X or S–S σ* orbitals contributes to these intermolecular interactions with relative energies in the order C–I > SN-II > C–Br > SN-III. The magnetism of 2 reveals a broad maximum in χ around 20 K indicative of short-range antiferromagnetic interactions. These are supported by DFT calculations that reveal a set of three significant exchange interactions which propagate in two dimensions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".