L’écriture cyborg: un bricolage (im)possible? Le (dés)astre: une genèse pour l’écriture? Un dialogue discursif entre Maurice Blanchot et Réjean Ducharme
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les réflexions développées dans cet article se constituent à partir d’études centrées sur l’analyse de mécanismes qui engendrent des inversions herméneutiques dans la déconstruction de certaines structures figées, de certitudes et de discours qui ne correspondent plus à ce qu’ils énoncent ou représentent. L’écriture fragmentaire de l’écrivain québécois Réjean Ducharme, la déconstruction derridienne et la conception du (dés)astre du philosophe français Maurice Blanchot nous invitent à établir un possible dialogue discursif entre les œuvres La fille de Christophe Colomb et L’écriture du désastre.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A ESCRITA CIBORGUE: UMA BRICOLAGEM (IM)POSSÍVEL? O DESASTRE: UMA GÊNESE PARA A ESCRITA? UM DIÁLOGO DISCURSIVO ENTRE MAURICE BLANCHOT E RÉJEAN DUCHARMEAs reflexões desenvolvidas neste artigo se constituem de a partir de estudos centrados na análise de mecanismos que engendram inversões hermenêuticas na desconstrução de certas estruturas fixas, certezas e discursos que não correspondem mais ao que enunciam ou representam. A escrita fragmentária do escritor quebequense Réjean Ducharme, a desconstrução e a concepção do desastre do filósofo francês Maurice Blanchot nos convidam a estabelecer um possível diálogo discursivo entre as obras La fille de Christophe Colomb e L’écriture du désastre.---Original em francês.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it