L’écriture cyborg: un bricolage (im)possible? Le (dés)astre: une genèse pour l’écriture? Un dialogue discursif entre Maurice Blanchot et Réjean Ducharme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les réflexions développées dans cet article se constituent à partir d’études centrées sur l’analyse de mécanismes qui engendrent des inversions herméneutiques dans la déconstruction de certaines structures figées, de certitudes et de discours qui ne correspondent plus à ce qu’ils énoncent ou représentent. L’écriture fragmentaire de l’écrivain québécois Réjean Ducharme, la déconstruction derridienne et la conception du (dés)astre du philosophe français Maurice Blanchot nous invitent à établir un possible dialogue discursif entre les œuvres La fille de Christophe Colomb et L’écriture du désastre.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A ESCRITA CIBORGUE: UMA BRICOLAGEM (IM)POSSÍVEL? O DESASTRE: UMA GÊNESE PARA A ESCRITA? UM DIÁLOGO DISCURSIVO ENTRE MAURICE BLANCHOT E RÉJEAN DUCHARMEAs reflexões desenvolvidas neste artigo se constituem de a partir de estudos centrados na análise de mecanismos que engendram inversões hermenêuticas na desconstrução de certas estruturas fixas, certezas e discursos que não correspondem mais ao que enunciam ou representam. A escrita fragmentária do escritor quebequense Réjean Ducharme, a desconstrução e a concepção do desastre do filósofo francês Maurice Blanchot nos convidam a estabelecer um possível diálogo discursivo entre as obras La fille de Christophe Colomb e L’écriture du désastre.---Original em francês.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".