Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Next Generation Space Telescope (NGST) will be an 8 m deployable telescope, radiatively cooled to 30 K and diffraction-limited at 2 μ m, operating at the Sun-Earth Lagrangian point L2. It will be built by a partnership of NASA, ESA, and CSA (Canadian Space Agency). The camera sensitivity should be limited by the zodiacal light for wavelengths < 10 μ m. The main scientific objectives are the study of the origin and evolution of galaxies, stars, and planets, beginning with the first luminous objects to form from the Big Bang. Other objectives include studies of dark matter, supernovae, the intergalactic medium, gamma ray bursts, star ages, and exobiology. The telescope will be operated like the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) by the Space Telescope Science Institute, with all observing programs openly solicited and selected by peer review. The NGST scientific requirements originated with the report of the Dressler Committee HST & Beyond. The instruments recommended by the Ad Hoc Science Working Group (ASWG) include 1) a wide field near infrared (NIR) camera with an 8K 2 detector array covering 0.6 - 5 μ m, 2) a multi-object NIR spectrograph capable of simultaneously observing > 100 objects with a resolution of R (λ/δλ) = 1000, and 3) a combined mid-infrared (MIR) camera and spectrograph from 5-27 μ m, with a resolution of R > 1500.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it