MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022959921 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1627

OR20-05 Regulation of Mouse Uterine Contractility by Regulator of G-Protein Signalling 2

2020· article· en· W3022959921 on OpenAlexaff
Daniela Urrego, Stephen Wood, Robert Newton, Donna M. Slater

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContractilityRGS2Regulator of G protein signalingUterine contractionEndocrinologyInternal medicineMyometriumOxytocinReceptorOxytocin receptorGq alpha subunitEx vivoWestern blotBiologyChemistryUterusG proteinIn vivoMedicineGTPase-activating proteinBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Uterine contractions in labour are produced by activation of receptors such as FP (PGF2α) and OXTR (oxytocin). Such receptors signal via Gαq proteins that can be selectively turned off by the regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2). RGS2 expression can be upregulated by Gαs-coupled receptor signaling. PGE2 elicits various uterine effects, some via activation of Gαs-coupled receptors. In primary human myometrial cells, PGE2 enhances RGS2 expression that attenuates subsequent oxytocin-stimulated calcium responses associated with contraction. RGS2 expression is higher in preterm non-labour versus labour human myometrium, suggesting that RGS2 promotes quiescence in the pregnant uterus. To directly study whether RGS2 dampens uterine contraction, we analyzed the ex vivo contractility of pregnant mouse uteri. We hypothesize that loss of RGS2 expression enhances oxytocin and PGF2α-stimulated uterine contractility. METHODS: Wildtype (WT) and RGS2 knockout (KO) female mice (8-14 weeks) were time-mated and euthanized on days 15-20 of pregnancy or during active labour (n=5-11 per group). Uteri were snap frozen for RNA/protein expression analysis by qPCR and western blot. Uterine sections from d18-19 were dissected into longitudinal strips for ex vivo contractility measurement. Tissues were submerged in Krebs-Henseleit buffer and tied to force transducers to measure isometric force development. Tissues were treated with or without 1μM PGE2 for 2 hours. In parallel, pretreated and non-pretreated tissues were exposed to increasing concentrations of oxytocin or PGF2α (0.1-10uM). All tissues were treated with 100mM KCl to determine the maximum contraction at the end of the experiment. Data were analyzed by ANOVA (Bonferroni post-hoc), or Student’s t-test, as appropriate. RESULTS: RGS2 expression in WT uteri sharply decreases at day 19 (p<0.05), remaining low during labour. OXTR and FP receptor expression increase at day 19 (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively) and are sustained through labour. Compared to WT, uteri from KO mice produced larger oxytocin-stimulated contractile amplitudes (p<0.05), and more frequent PGF2α-stimulated contractions (p<0.05). PGE2 pretreatment enhanced RGS2 expression in WT uteri, which reduced the peak amplitudes and integrals elicited by subsequent oxytocin treatment, compared to non-pretreated uteri (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: RGS2 may play a pro-quiescent role in pregnancy, since RGS2 loss enhances uterine contractility. Concomitant upregulation of pro-contractile receptors and RGS2 downregulation may facilitate labour activation. This mechanisms may be involved in the etiology of spontaneous preterm labour; loss of RGS2 expression observed in human preterm labour may allow for early contractile activation. Understanding RGS2’s role in quiescence is important to developing more effective strategies for managing preterm labour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicReproductive System and PregnancyFrench-language works237,207