MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3023014957 · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2018-bcs.53

53 Abnormal myocardial strain in adult patients with unrepaired ebsteins anomaly and prediction of impaired exercise tolerance

2018· article· en· W3023014957 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmed M. Dardeer, Lucy Hudsmith, Boyang Liu, Roman Wesołowski, Richard P. Steeds

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyEjection fractionInternal medicineHeart failureMagnetic resonance imagingDiastoleRadiologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Morbidity and mortality in unrepaired Ebstein’s anomaly (EA) relate to exercise capacity, ventricular dysfunction and congestive cardiac failure. Accurate assessment of ejection fraction is difficult due to geometry of the ventricles and complex anatomy of the tricuspid valve in these patients. Myocardial deformation detects ventricular function before other parameters in other cardiovascular disease and has incremental value in predicting outcome but has not been tested in EA. Objectives 1. To compare myocardial deformation in adult patients with unrepaired EA with control subjects; 2. To investigate the relationship with exercise capacity as a known predictor of outcome in these patients measured using cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPEX). Methodology This is a single, centre study of 36 consecutive patients with unrepaired EA (20 females) aged 36.3±13.2 years undergoing cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR; 1.5T Avanto, Siemens). 2D RV longitudinal strain (RV GLS) and 3D left ventricular longitudinal (GLS) and circumferential (GCS) strains were obtained using Circle cvi42 (Calgary, Canada). Strain values were compared with normative data obtained from age and sex matched healthy controls using paired samples t test. Pearson correlation was used to study the correlation between strain and cardiopulmonary exercise measures. Results Demographic data and conventional CMR data in EA and controls are displayed in table 1. RV end diastolic volume was increased in EA and the RV and LV ejection fraction were impaired compared to the healthy controls. RV GLS and RA GLS were impaired in EA compared to control subjects, as were LV GLS and GCS (see figure 2). RA peak strain correlated with% predicted VO2 peak (r=−0.472, p=0.017), peak VO2 (r=−0.431, p=0.028) and VE/VCO2 slope (r=0.414, p=0.036 respectively). There was no correlation between severity of tricuspid regurgitation, RV ejection fraction or any RV strain parameters and CPEX parameters. Conclusion In adult patients with unrepaired EA, RV, RA and LV global strains are impaired compared to controls. Functional RA peak strain is related to impaired exercise capacity and future study is needed to establish whether these parameters have independent prognostic value in this cohort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors→French-language works237,207→