A NECESSARY MOMENT CONDITION FOR THE FRACTIONAL FUNCTIONAL CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We discuss the moment condition for the fractional functional central limit theorem (FCLT) for partial sums of x t = Δ − d u t , where $d\, \in \,\left({ - {1 \over 2}\,,\,{1 \over 2}} \right)$ is the fractional integration parameter and u t is weakly dependent. The classical condition is existence of q ≥ 2 and $q\, > \,\left( {d\, + \,{1 \over 2}} \right)^{ - 1} $ moments of the innovation sequence. When d is close to $ - {1 \over 2}$ this moment condition is very strong. Our main result is to show that when $d\, \in \,\left({ - \,{1 \over 2},\,0} \right)$ and under some relatively weak conditions on u t , the existence of $q\, \ge \,\left({d\, + \,{1 \over 2}} \right)^{ - 1} $ moments is in fact necessary for the FCLT for fractionally integrated processes and that $q\, > \,\left( {d\, + \,{1 \over 2}} \right)^{ - 1} $ moments are necessary for more general fractional processes. Davidson and de Jong (2000, Econometric Theory 16, 643–666) presented a fractional FCLT where only q > 2 finite moments are assumed. As a corollary to our main theorem we show that their moment condition is not sufficient and hence that their result is incorrect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it