MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023240439 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd62b

Discovering New Strong Gravitational Lenses in the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys

2021· article· en· W3023240439 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaosheng Huang, Christopher Storfer, Andi Gu, Vikram Ravi, Andrew Pilon, William Sheu, R. Venguswamy, S. Banka, Arjun Dey, Martin Landriau, Dustin Lang, Aaron Meisner, John Moustakas, Adam D. Myers, R. Sajith, Edward F. Schlafly, David J. Schlegel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPerimeter Institute
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratorySLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryFermilabHigh Energy PhysicsOffice of ScienceInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUniversity College LondonNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of PortsmouthOhio State UniversityIntegrated Electronics Engineering Center, Binghamton UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignFinanciadora de Estudos e ProjetosFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroUniversity of SussexUniversity of PennsylvaniaArgonne National LaboratoryU.S. Department of EnergyConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoUniversity of ChicagoNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstronomyGravitational lensGravitationAstrophysicsGalaxyRedshift

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We have conducted a search for new strong gravitational lensing systems in the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Legacy Imaging Surveys’ Data Release 8. We use deep residual neural networks, building on previous work presented by Huang et al. These surveys together cover approximately one-third of the sky visible from the Northern Hemisphere, reaching a z -band AB magnitude of ∼22.5. We compile a training sample that consists of known lensing systems as well as non-lenses in the Legacy Surveys and the Dark Energy Survey. After applying our trained neural networks to the survey data, we visually inspect and rank images with probabilities above a threshold. Here we present 1210 new strong lens candidates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207