Kaleidoscope: A New Bioinformatics Pipeline Web Application for In Silico Hypothesis Exploration of Omics Signatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background In silico data exploration is a key first step of exploring a research question. There are many publicly available databases and tools that offer appealing features to help with such a task. However, many applications lack exposure or are constrained with unfriendly or outdated user interfaces. Thus, it follows that there are many resources that are relevant to investigation of medical disorders that are underutilized. Results We developed an R Shiny web application, called Kaleidoscope, to address this challenge. The application offers access to several omics databases and tools to let users explore research questions in silico . The application is designed to be user- friendly with a unified user interface, while also scalable by offering the option of uploading user-defined datasets. We demonstrate the application features with a starting query of a single gene (Disrupted in schizophrenia 1, DISC1) to assess its protein-protein interactions network. We then explore expression levels of the gene network across tissues and cell types in the brain, as well as across 34 schizophrenia versus control differential gene expression datasets. Conclusion Kaleidoscope provides easy access to several databases and tools under a unified user interface to explore research questions in silico . The web application is open-source and freely available at https://kalganem.shinyapps.io/Kaleidoscope/ . This application streamlines the process of in silico data exploration for users and expands the efficient use of these tools to stakeholders without specific bioinformatics expertise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".