MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3023478738 · doi:10.1101/2020.05.08.085233

Structural basis for histone variant H3tK27me3 recognition by PHF1 and PHF19

2020· preprint· en· W3023478738 on OpenAlexafffund
Dong Cheng, Reiko Nakagawa, Kyohei Oyama, Yusuke Yamamoto, Weilian Zhang, Yanjun Li, Yuriko Yoshimura, Hiroyuki Kamiya, Jun‐ichi Nakayama, Jun Ueda, Jinrong Min

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsStructural Genomics ConsortiumUniversity of Toronto
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKato Memorial Bioscience FoundationNovartis PharmaOntario Genomics InstituteEuropean Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and AssociationsMerck KGaAOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceOntario GenomicsGenome CanadaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloAkiyama Life Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaTakeda Science FoundationNankai UniversityPfizerUniversity of SaskatchewanNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaState Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical BiologyCanadian Light Source
KeywordsPRC2PHD fingerCell biologyHistonePolycomb-group proteinsHistone H3Gene silencingHox geneChemistryBiologyGeneticsGeneZinc fingerTranscription factorRepressor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The PRC2 (Polycomb repressive complex 2) complex is a multi-component histone H3K27 methyltransferase, best known for silencing Hox genes during embryonic development. The Polycomb-like proteins PHF1, MTF2 and PHF19 are critical components of PRC2 by stimulating its catalytic activity in embryonic stem (ES) cells. The Tudor domains of PHF1/19 have been previously shown to be readers of H3K36me3 in vitro . However, some other studies suggest that PHF1 and PHF19 co-localize with the H3K27me3 mark, but not H3K36me3 in cells. Here, we provide further evidence that PHF1 co-localizes with H3tK27 in testis, and its Tudor domain preferentially binds to H3tK27me3 over canonical H3K27me3 in vitro . Our complex structures of the Tudor domains of PHF1 and PHF19 with H3tK27me3 shed light on the molecular basis for preferential recognition of H3tK27me3 by PHF1 and PHF19 over canonical H3K27me3, implicating that H3tK27me3 might be a physiological ligand of PHF1/19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→