Yeast-Based Genetic Interaction Analysis of Human Kinome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kinases are critical intracellular signaling proteins. To better understand kinase-mediated signal transduction, a large-scale human–yeast genetic interaction screen was performed. Among 597 human kinase genes tested, 28 displayed strong toxicity in yeast when overexpressed. En masse transformation of these toxic kinase genes into 4653 homozygous diploid yeast deletion mutants followed by barcode sequencing identified yeast toxicity modifiers and thus their human orthologs. Subsequent network analyses and functional grouping revealed that the 28 kinases and their 676 interaction partners (corresponding to a total of 969 genetic interactions) are enriched in cell death and survival (34%), small-molecule biochemistry (18%) and molecular transport (11%), among others. In the subnetwork analyses, a few kinases were commonly associated with glioma, cell migration and cell death/survival. Our analysis enabled the creation of a first draft of the kinase genetic interactome network and identified multiple drug targets for inflammatory diseases and cancer, in which deregulated kinase signaling plays a pathogenic role.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".