O papel do ultrassom point‐of‐care e questões relacionadas à ventilação unipulmonar em neonatos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CARTA AO EDITOR O papel do ultrassom point-of-care e questões relacionadas à ventilac ¸ão unipulmonar em neonatos The role of point-of-care ultrasound and issues related to one-lung ventilation in neonates Cara Editora, Lemos com interesse o relato de caso publicado por Rodrigues et al. 1 descrevendo o uso de ventilac ¸ão monopulmonar em neonato submetido a lobectomia superior esquerda.Os autores merecem elogios pela conduta clínica adotada e, especificamente, pelo emprego do ultrassom à beira leito (POCUS, do inglês Point of Care Ultrasound) para confirmar o isolamento pulmonar.De fato, em adultos, o POCUS revelou maior precisão (95%) quando comparado à ausculta (62%) no diagnóstico diferencial entre a intubac ¸ão traqueal e brônquica.2 Gostaríamos aqui brevemente de complementar alguns sinais que caracterizam, e por assim dizer conferem a ''assinatura'' à imagem ultrassonográfica pulmonar, além de comentar alguns desafios que são associados à técnica descrita pelos autores.O ultrassom de pulmão se baseia principalmente em artefatos
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".