MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023611843 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.2332

MON-LB9 Cyclic Progesterone Therapy in Androgenic Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) - Person-Related 6-Month Experience Changes

2020· article· en· W3023611843 on OpenAlexaff
Sonia Shirin, Faye Murray, Maryam Hajjaran, Azita Goshtasebi, Dharani Kalidasan, Jerilynn C. Prior

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolycystic ovaryMedicineOvulationLuteal phaseFollicular phaseMenstrual cycleAnxietyInternal medicineHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Endometrial cancer1 and oligomenorrhea2 are common risks for women living with androgenic PCOS (WLWP); cyclic progesterone therapy could prevent both. Cyclic oral micronized progesterone therapy (Cyclic OMP; 300 mg at hs/14 days/cycle) also corrects the neuroendocrine origins of PCOS3. Although vaginal progesterone is used in PCOS ovulation induction 4, and short Cyclic OMP decreases LH and/or Testosterone 5,6, no WLWP person-level prospective data with Cyclic OMP therapy are published. A WLWP, aged 31, BMI 20.1, with heavy flow and slightly irregular ~35-day cycles, was unable to tolerate birth control pills. She was prescribed Cyclic OMP (300 mg/h.s. cycle days 14-27)7. She began keeping the Menstrual Cycle Diary© (Diary), a 19-item tool (scored 0-4), during her 1st Cyclic OMP cycle and took no other therapy. This pilot study was designed to understand Cyclic OMP-related experience changes in WLWP: 1) by documenting experience changes on the 1st to the 6th complete Diary; and 2) by assessing follicular phase changes in baseline data (no Rx) vs. cycles 3 and 6. We entered data from six consecutive Diaries into an SPSS (Version 24) database. Analysis #1 used Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Tests (for within-person ordinal data) and #2 repeated measures ANOVA. Research question: What Cyclic OMP-related experience changes occurred for a WLWP? On Cyclic OMP, she spontaneously reported improvements in aching joints, sleep and GI problems. We assessed selected, potentially E2-related Diary changes: flow, fluid retention, breast tenderness, stretchy cervical mucus and anxiety. Cyclic OMP was associated with shorter cycle lengths of 28.17+/-0.8 days. Fluid retention (P=0.000), mucus (P=0.048), and breast tenderness (P=0.000) all decreased, but anxiety and flow were unchanged. Follicular phase only fluid retention significantly decreased (F (1.2, 14.7) = 6.7, P =0.017). Although open-label, these prospective analyses suggest that Cyclic OMP, alone, is related to short-term benefits in androgenic PCOS. Prospective studies and controlled comparative trials of this innovative “luteal phase replacement” PCOS therapy are needed. Reference:1Barry J Hum Reprod Update 2014 20:748. 2Azziz R Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016;2:16057. 3Blank S Hum Reprod Update 2006;12:351. 4Montville C Fertil Steril 2010;94:678. 5Livadas S Fertil Steril 2010;94:242. 6Bagis T J Clin Endocr Met 2002;87:4536. 7Prior J https://hellocluecom/articles/cycle-a-z/the-case-for-a-new-pcos-therapy 2018

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicOvarian function and disordersFrench-language works237,207