PATHOGENICITY OF CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA NUCLEOPOLYHEDROVIRUS PROPAGATED IN VITRO AT DIFFERENT INCUBATION TEMPERATURES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract To optimize the in vitro production of Choristoneura fumiferana nucleopolyhedrovirus (CfMNPV) as a potential microbial pest control agent, the pathogenicity of occlusion bodies (OBs) produced in two cell lines at three incubation temperatures was determined by bioassay. A plaque-purified isolate of CfMNPV was amplified in permissive C. fumiferana cell lines, FPMI-CF-203 and FPMI-CF-2C1, and incubated at 22, 24, and 28° C. Occlusion bodies propagated in FPMI-CF-203 cells at 28° C were significantly larger (17.5 μm3) and more pathogenic (LD50 = 27; LD95 = 185, where LD50 and LD95 are doses required to kill 50 and 95% of the test larvae, respectively) than those produced in either of the cell lines at any of the incubation temperatures tested. Increased temperatures yielded larger OBs from both cell lines. The pathogenicity of OBs propagated in the FPMI-CF-203 cell line increased with incubation temperature, whereas that of OBs produced in FPMI-CF-2C1 cells decreased. Comparison of the pathogenicity of OBs, whether naturally occurring or genetically modified, should be standardized by cell line and incubation temperature used for propagation. Production efficiency decreased with increasing incubation temperature for each cell line. Lower incubation temperatures used for propagation, and standardization of the titer of viral inoculum, should be further investigated to determine the economic feasibility of the in vitro production of CfMNPV as a microbial pest control agent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".