MON-LB012 Long-Term Developmental Impact of Withholding Parenteral Nutrition in Pediatric-ICU: A 4-Year Follow-Up of the Pepanic Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aim: Between 2012-2015, the PEPaNIC randomized controlled trial, which included 1440 critically ill infants and children, showed that withholding parenteral nutrition during the first week in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) (late-PN), as compared with initiating supplemental PN early (early-PN), improved PICU outcomes (1) and improved neurocognitive development assessed 2 years later (2). The latter was explained by avoiding early-PN induced adversely altered DNA-methylation of 37 CpG sites (3). As a large number of patients were younger than 1 year of age at randomization and given that assessment of most neurocognitive domains is only possible from 4 years of age onwards, we performed a 4-year follow-up to determine the impact of late-PN versus early-PN on physical, neurocognitive, and emotional/behavioral development. This pre-planned, 4-year follow-up study of the 1440 PEPaNIC patients and of 369 matched healthy children was blinded for treatment allocation (ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT01536275). Methods: Studied clinical outcomes included anthropometrics, health status, parent/caregiver-reported executive functions, and emotional/behavioral problems, and clinical tests for intelligence, visual-motor integration, alertness, motor coordination and memory. Univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses adjusted for risk factors assessed the impact of late-PN versus early-PN on the outcomes and investigated a potential mediation role of the adversely altered DNA-methylation of 37 CpG sites previously shown to be evoked by late-PN as compared with early-PN (3). Results: Overall, at 4 years follow-up, patients (356 late-PN patients, 328 early-PN patients) could be tested neurocognitively. They revealed worse anthropometric, health status, neurocognitive and emotional/behavioral developmental outcomes than the healthy control children. Outcomes of late-PN patients were never worse than those of early-PN patients. In contrast, late-PN patients had fewer internalizing (P=0.042) and externalizing problems (P=0.046), and fewer total emotional/behavioral problems (P=0.007) than early-PN patients, which were normalized by late-PN. Avoiding the early-PN induced adversely altered DNA-methylation status of the 37 CpG sites statistically explained its impact on the behavioral outcomes. Conclusion: Four years after randomization to late-PN or early-PN in the PICU, late-PN did not show harm, and was found to protect against emotional/behavioral problems, with altered DNA-methylation as a potential biological mediator hereof. These data further support de-implementation of PN-use early during critical illness in infants and children. (1) Fivez et al. N Eng J Med 2016 (2) Verstraete et al. Lancet Respir Med 2019 (3) Guiza et al. Lancet Respir Med 2020 (in press)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".