The role of cytochrome P450 gene rs1126742 polymorphism and risk of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CYP4A11 gene T8590C (rs1126742) is proved to be an important locus that is relevant to hypertension. Various research on the relationship between rs1126742 polymorphism and hypertension have been published, but due to small sample sizes and limitations of the research objects, the combined results remain controversial. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, OVID, Web of Science, Wan Fang, and CNKI databases for related articles. Three authors individually extracted data and the quality of studies was evaluated by using the 9-point Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) independently. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in different genetic models by using a random-effect model or fixed-effect model according to inter-study heterogeneity. Besides, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed and the publication bias was assessed. RESULTS: There were totally 12 independent case-control studies of 8673 cases and 6611 controls included. Significant associations were found between CYP4A11 gene T8590C polymorphism and hypertension under all genetic models (allele, homozygote, heterozygote, recessive, and dominant model). We also found that there was no obvious relationship between the rs1126742 polymorphism and hypertension in Asian. But positive association has been found in Caucasian in allele, homozygote, and recessive model. CONCLUSIONS: CYP4A11 gene T8590C (rs1126742) polymorphism increases the occurrence of hypertension, particularly in Caucasian.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it