MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023928318 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2991668

PMSG-Based Wind Energy Conversion Systems Integration Into DC Microgrids With a Novel Compact Converter

2020· article· en· W3023928318 on OpenAlexaff
Javad Khodabakhsh, Ebrahim Mohammadi, Gerry Moschopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersGalvanic isolationFlyback converterComputer scienceForward converterBoost converterĆuk converterMATLABVoltagePower (physics)Energy transformationElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringControl theory (sociology)EngineeringPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DC microgrids (DC-MGs) are recognized as an efficient alternative for common AC-MGs. DC-MGs need fewer power electronic converters since most of distributed generation (DG) units and electronic loads operate with DC voltage. The integration of DGs that generate AC voltage, such as wind energy conversion systems (WECSs) into DC-MGs, however, requires an AC-DC conversion unit to perform AC-DC conversion and galvanic isolation and to control the WECS. Typically, two separate cascaded converters are used to perform such functions, which increases the cost and size of DC-MGs. In this paper, an isolated single-stage AC-DC converter is proposed that is able to perform all the required function of a WECS AC-DC conversion unit, to overcome the drawbacks of the two-converter structure. First, the operation of the proposed converter and its features as a single unit are described. The operation of the WECS with the proposed converter is then studied. A design procedure for both the steady-state and dynamic operation of the converter is developed based on a mathematical model. Experimental results obtained from a scaled-down prototype converter are also presented to confirm the feasibility of the proposed converter as a single unit. The complete WECS operation is verified by the simulation results of the aerodynamic, mechanical, and electrical system models, using MATLAB/SIMULINK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207