HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRY IN GEORGIA: HIDDEN PAGES (DEDICATED TO OUR TEACHERS).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Psychiatry preserves a special place among the diverse medical specialties. It is noteworthy that in Europe and America the professional and scientific psychiatry gradually emerged during the second half in 1800s. Roots of psychiatry in Georgia go back to the distant past. However, the modern scientific psychiatry started developing in Georgia shortly after the foundation of the medical faculty at Tbilisi State University (1921) and is closely are associated with the name of Prof. M.Asatiani (1882-1938). This survey reflects data from all obtainable and basic psychiatric records of this period and provides brief description of significant achievements of psychiatrists, working in Georgia during 1920-1940 (M. Asatiani, A. Gotsiridze, N. Veshapeli, O. Chitava, Sh. Kipiani, G. Shengelaia, I. Menteshahvili, A. Zurabashvili, I. Bzhalava, E. Nakashidze, E. Gobronidze, V. Gudiashvili, Sh. Kvitsaridze, A. Amirgarov, N. Shubladze, I. Tavdishvili, Hovakim, Nikolava, Sulava, Shiukashvili, I. Egizarov). Finally, we would like to emphasize that Georgian psychiatrists widely presented quantitative and qualitative studies on methodology and on treatment of main mental disorders, described their views on psychology, characterology, pathophysiology, physiology, morphology, psychotherapy, classification and etc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".