MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Endothelial Activation, Quantified By Electron Microscopy Scoring or Multiplexed Gene Expression, Predicts Accelerated Graft Loss in Patients With Transplant Glomerulopathy.

2014· article· en· W3024051201 on OpenAlexaff
Paula Blanco, Shahid Husain, Philip F. Halloran, B. Sis

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal and Vascular Pathologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectron microscopeGene expressionPathologyGeneMedicineBiologyGeneticsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is a sign of chronic kidney transplant damage with poor survival and no effective therapies. However, some patients with TG stay free of dialysis for years. There are significant limitations in the understanding of disease progression in TG. We aimed to explore genome-wide transcription profiles of TG and their relationship with ultrastructural changes in kidney biopsies and graft survival. The study included kidney allograft biopsies for cause from 40 patients with TG and post-transplant time matched 54 control patients without TG. We developed an electron microscopical (EM) scoring system to semi-quantify morphological profiles of microvascular endothelial cells of glomerular and peritubular capillaries (cytoplasmic swelling, loss of fenestrations, subendothelial widening, microvilli) and podocytes (cytoplasmic swelling, foot process effacement) and recorded an EM sum-score for endothelial cells and podocytes. The interobserver reproducibility of endothelial and podocyte EM scores were %99.2 and 99.1% respectively. A class comparison of microarrays showed 34 probe sets as higher in TG vs. non-TG, including 7 endothelial transcripts (i.e. DARC, VWF, MCAM, ICAM1) and 6 Fc receptor transcripts (i.e. FCGR3A,B, FCGR2A, FCGR1B), suggesting that endothelial activation and activating Fc receptors are involved in pathogenesis of TG. Microvascular endothelial EM sum-scores were higher in TG vs. non-TG biopsies and positively correlated with molecular disturbances, particularly transcripts reflecting endothelial activation, NK cell burden, and interferon-gamma effects (p<0.001). Podocyte EM sum-scores were not different between TG and non-TG. We stratified TG into 2 prognostic groups using either molecularly or electron microscopically defined endothelial activation: progressive TG kidneys with accelerated graft loss and non-progressive TG kidneys with no significant graft loss. In multivariate survival models, endothelial EM sum-score (p=0.007) and endothelial gene set expression (p=0.029) were independent prognostic factors after adjusting for clinical and pathological confounders (C4d, glomerular double contour cg-score, donor specific antibody, proteinuria, eGFR at time of biopsy, and interstitial fibrosis ci-score). Thus, increased renal endothelial activation seems related to disease progression in TG. Endothelial EM scoring or endothelial gene signatures can serve as predictive biomarkers in patients with TG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicRenal and Vascular PathologiesFrench-language works237,207