Genomic analyses for predicted milk fatty acid composition throughout lactation in North American Holstein cattle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Milk fat composition has important implications in the nutritional and processing properties of milk. Additionally, milk fat composition is associated with cow physiological and health status. The main objectives of this study were (1) to estimate genetic parameters for 5 milk fatty acid (FA) groups (i.e., short-chain, medium-chain, long-chain, saturated, and unsaturated) predicted from milk infrared spectra using a large data set; (2) to predict genomic breeding values using a longitudinal single-step genomic BLUP approach; and (3) to conduct a single-step GWAS aiming to identify genomic regions, candidate genes, and metabolic pathways associated with milk FA, and consequently, to understand the underlying biology of these traits. We used 629,769 test-day records of 201,465 first-parity Holstein cows from 6,105 herds. A total of 8,865 genotyped (Illumina BovineSNP50K BeadChip, Illumina, San Diego, CA) animals were considered for the genomic analyses. The average daily heritability ranged from 0.24 (unsaturated FA) to 0.47 (medium-chain and saturated FA). The reliability of the genomic breeding values ranged from 0.56 (long-chain fatty acid) to 0.74 (medium-chain fatty acid) when using the default τ and ω scaling parameters, whereas it ranged from 0.58 (long-chain fatty acid) to 0.73 (short-chain fatty acid) when using the optimal τ and ω values (i.e., τ = 1.5 and ω = 0.6), as defined in a previous study in the same population. Relevant chromosomal regions were identified in Bos taurus autosomes 5 and 14. The proportion of the variance explained by 20 adjacent single nucleotide polymorphisms ranged from 0.71% (saturated FA) to 15.12% (long-chain FA). Important candidate genes and pathways were also identified. In summary, our results contribute to a better understanding of the genetic architecture of predicted milk FA in dairy cattle and reinforce the relevance of using genomic information for genetic analyses of these traits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".