MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024278440 · doi:10.1109/tgcn.2020.2994513

Evaluation of RF Energy Harvesting by Mobile D2D Nodes Within a Stochastic Field of Base Stations

2020· article· en· W3024278440 on OpenAlexaff
Sachitha Kusaladharma, Chintha Tellambura, Zhang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaConcordia University
FundersHuawei Technologies
KeywordsRayleigh fadingEnergy harvestingBase stationPoisson point processComputer scienceStochastic geometryFadingCoverage probabilityPath lossEnergy (signal processing)Markov processTransmission (telecommunications)Markov chainPoint processCellular networkComputer networkWirelessTelecommunicationsStatisticsMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radio frequency energy harvesting can prolong the battery life and improve energy efficiency of device-to-device (D2D) communication. In this paper, we analyze the performance of a mobile D2D device powered by EH from the transmissions of underlying cellular base stations (BSs), whose locations are modeled as a homogeneous Poisson point process. We model the movements of D2D nodes via a modified random waypoint model. Log-distance path loss and Rayleigh fading are considered, and EH takes place solely within harvesting zones surrounding each BS and each D2D user harvests energy for a fixed number of charging time slots before attempting to transmit. We derive the probability of a D2D device being within an EH region surrounding BSs after multiple movements, and the probability of being within the fully charged state using a Markov-chain approach taking into account temporal effects. Moreover, the statistics of the harvested energy are characterized, and subsequently, the outage probability of a D2D transmission utilizing the harvested energy is derived. We show that the number of movements required to be within a harvesting region increases significantly when the harvesting threshold power increases, and that the number of harvesting time slots should be selected judiciously.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and NetworkingSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207