MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024338740 · doi:10.1097/ncm.0000000000000211

Quality Living Has No Expiry Date

2017· article· en· W3024338740 on OpenAlexaffabout
Clara de Necker

Bibliographic record

VenueProfessional Case Management · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsCARE Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPleasureHealth careCase managementManagementBusinessPublic relationsNursingPsychologyMedicinePolitical scienceLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clara de Necker, BCur, obtained her BCur degree in Nursing Science, specialized in Critical Care, where she was awarded best student of the year for general critical care. She furthered her career into Case Management, awarded the National Case Manager of the Year Award twice in a row, after which she started her own Clinical Consultancy business. This included case management as a function for Sleepnet, coordinating the Home Ventilation Program. She is currently the Health Information Support Manager in the Health Information Management Department for Mediclinic International, skilled in multiple clinical coding systems across all business platforms, while continuing her part-time involvement with case management for the Home Ventilation Program. Address correspondence to Clara de Necker, BCur, Suite 146, P/B X3018, Strand, SA 7140 ([email protected]). Note: Many of us have the pleasure of meeting case managers both across the country and around the world at the CMSA Annual Conferences year after year. Our colleagues travel from South Africa, Australia, England, Germany, South Korea, Malaysia, and Canada. This issue's column was written by Clara de Necker, a case manager hailing from South Africa. The story should be relatable to many readers and proves that the heart of case management beats across borders.The intent of this column is meant to speak to the heart of case management: our joys, our struggles, and our lessons learned. Please send your thoughts and ideas to us so we may include them in future articles. Mindy Owen at: [email protected]. Teri Treiger at: [email protected].The author reports no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.051
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.051
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0160.009
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5950.468

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProfessional Case ManagementSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207