MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024338740 · doi:10.1097/ncm.0000000000000211

Quality Living Has No Expiry Date

2017· article· en· W3024338740 on OpenAlexaffabout
Clara de Necker

Bibliographic record

VenueProfessional Case Management · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsCARE Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPleasureHealth careCase managementManagementBusinessPublic relationsNursingPsychologyMedicinePolitical scienceLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clara de Necker, BCur, obtained her BCur degree in Nursing Science, specialized in Critical Care, where she was awarded best student of the year for general critical care. She furthered her career into Case Management, awarded the National Case Manager of the Year Award twice in a row, after which she started her own Clinical Consultancy business. This included case management as a function for Sleepnet, coordinating the Home Ventilation Program. She is currently the Health Information Support Manager in the Health Information Management Department for Mediclinic International, skilled in multiple clinical coding systems across all business platforms, while continuing her part-time involvement with case management for the Home Ventilation Program. Address correspondence to Clara de Necker, BCur, Suite 146, P/B X3018, Strand, SA 7140 ([email protected]). Note: Many of us have the pleasure of meeting case managers both across the country and around the world at the CMSA Annual Conferences year after year. Our colleagues travel from South Africa, Australia, England, Germany, South Korea, Malaysia, and Canada. This issue's column was written by Clara de Necker, a case manager hailing from South Africa. The story should be relatable to many readers and proves that the heart of case management beats across borders.The intent of this column is meant to speak to the heart of case management: our joys, our struggles, and our lessons learned. Please send your thoughts and ideas to us so we may include them in future articles. Mindy Owen at: [email protected]. Teri Treiger at: [email protected].The author reports no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProfessional Case ManagementSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207