Results of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Combined With Endarterectomy and Reconstruction of Anterior Descending Artery in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To assess results of coronary artery bypass surgery combined with endarterectomy (EAE) in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and diabetes mellitus (DM), and impact of DM on clinical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We recruited in this study 152 patients with IHD (43 with and 109 without DM) subjected to coronary artery bypass surgery with EAE from anterior descending artery (ADA) between 2003 and 2010. Forty three patients had concomitant DM (main group) 109 - had not (control group). Mean age was 57+/-18 and 60+/-19 years, portion of patients with class III-IV angina - 71.1 and 73.3%, with history of myocardial infarction - 74.4 and 68.8%, in main and control group, respectively (p>0.05). RESULTS: In hospital mortality was 4.6 and 3.6% in main and control group, respectively. Number of patients examined in remote period was 127 (87.6%). Mean follow-up was 4.5+/-1.2 years. Survival was 90.7 and 100% (p>0.05). Graft angiography was performed in 12 and 43 patients (27.9 and 39.4%) with portions of patent arterial conduits 91.6 and 100%, patent venous conduits 90.0 and 90.3% in main and control group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Under conditions of strict control of glycemia coronary artery bypass surgery with EAE from ADA in IHD patients with DM is associated with acceptable hospital mortality and survival, moderate risk of remote cardiovascular complications, and satisfactory patency of conduits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".