Effects of high differential stress and mineral properties on deformation and failure mechanism of hard rocks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To study the deformation and failure mechanism of hard rocks, true triaxial compression tests were conducted on four types of hard rocks to obtain the complete stress–strain curves and failure modes. Under true triaxial compression conditions, the shapes of the complete stress–strain curves can be divided into three types: elastic–brittle (EB), elastic–plastic–brittle (EPB), and elastic–plastic–ductile (EPD) types. According to the different post-peak deformation behaviours, the stress–strain curves of EPB type can be subdivided into three sub-categories: post-peak instantaneous brittle (EPB-I), post-peak multi-stage brittle (EPB-M), and post-peak delayed brittle (EPB-D). The stress–strain curves change from EPD to EPB-D, EPB-M, EPB-I, and finally EB with increasing differential stress (σ 2 – σ 3 ). The deformation characteristics are dependent on intermediate principal stress σ 2 , minimum principal stress σ 3 , mineral compositions, and mineral textures of rock samples. An increase in σ 3 leads to an increased ductility, while an increase in σ 2 leads to an increased brittleness. Moreover, rocks with regular mineral textures and low mineral hardness are more prone to ductility. When the deformation curve is transformed from EPD to EPB and then to EB, the tensile crack gradually predominates, and the macroscopic failure angle gradually becomes steeper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".