MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024523492 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-012403mtgabs

Study of the Lithium/Polymer Interface and Conductive Deposits on Lithium Metal Used for Lithium Metal Polymer Batteries.

2020· article· en· W3024523492 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Storelli, Natalia Alzate‐Carvajal, Steeve Rousselot, Vincent Pelé, Mickaël Dollé

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteMaterials scienceAnodeLithium (medication)Faraday efficiencyIonic conductivityPolymerFast ion conductorPlating (geology)Chemical engineeringComposite materialElectrodeChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium metal anode has recently regained tremendous attention in the frame of the development of higher power and energy density lithium batteries for automotive industry. Lithium metal is indeed an ideal anode for lithium batteries due to its high capacity (3860 mAh/g). However, upon high discharge currents, the growth of dendrites leads to cell short cuts and limited coulombic efficiency. This issue had first restrained its practical application in rechargeable batteries for high power applications until the use of solid polymer electrolytes that could mechanically prevent the dendrites from crossing the electrolyte. Among the different families of polymer electrolytes, polyethylene oxide-based (PEO-based) electrolytes have been established as the reference thanks to a reasonable conductivity above 60oC and its ability to form a stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) with lithium. Nevertheless, due to the low transference number of POE/LiTFSI electrolytes (t+≈0.15), dendrites or uneven lithium plating are still susceptible to form. Nowadays, many efforts are dedicated to solve these problems by focusing either on the improvement of the electrolyte or on the modification of the lithium-electrolyte interface. Gold layers have been proposed as an alternative to prevent dendrite formation; these gold coatings are used mainly together with ceramic electrolytes in order to improve the interface between Li metal anode and electrolyte. However, their use with polymer electrolytes where dendrite formation is favorable due to low transference number and mechanical strength have not being widely studied. In this presentation, three different coatings will be considered; aluminum (Al), gold (Au) and lithium fluoride (LiF). The choice of Al and Au is based on their ability to form Li-rich alloys while LiF is known to act as an artificial ion conducting SEI. The morphology and physico-chemical properties of the coatings are first characterized by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) before evaluation of the interface between POE-based electrolyte and coated Lithium. Eventually stability during long-term cycling in Lithium Metal Polymer batteries is performed and compared to that of cells made using bare Lithium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207