MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024538145 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-01221321mtgabs

Tunable Shortwave Infrared and Midwave Infrared Optoelectronics in Germanium/Germanium Tin Core/Shell Nanowires

2020· article· en· W3024538145 on OpenAlexaff
Lu Luo, Simone Assali, Mahmoud R. M. Atalla, Sebastian Koelling, Oussama Moutanabbir

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanowireGermaniumOptoelectronicsPhotoluminescenceChemical vapor depositionInfraredResponsivitySemiconductorSubstrate (aquarium)NanotechnologyPhotodetectorOpticsSilicon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Semiconductor nanowire(NW)-based optoelectronic devices can exhibit superior performances in comparison to their thin film counterparts, as a result of their improved electrical and optical properties. For example, the light-matter interaction in nanowires is enhanced due to the high surface-volume ratio and the light confinement effect resulting from the resonant cavity formed by the nanowire. The enhanced light absorption when using a nanowire geometry can be exploited to increase the responsivity of nanowire-based photodetectors. Light detection and emission at near-IR wavelengths (NIR, 0.8-1.5 μm) can be tailored via strain engineering using Ge-based NW devices.[1] Furthermore, by incorporating Sn in the Ge lattice a direct band gap can be achieved across the short-wave-IR (SWIR, 1.5-3.0 μm) and mid-IR (MIR, 3-8 μm) wavelength range.[2] Despite the equilibrium solubility of Sn in Ge being limited to ~1at.%, non-equilibrium growth methods recently developed in a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reactor demonstrated a Sn content of 18 at.% with a room-temperature photoluminescence emission up to 4.0 μm [3]. Similarly, when moving to the nanoscale a Sn incorporation well above 10 at.% with a direct band gap emission was demonstrated using Ge/GeSn core/shell NWs.[4] In this presentation, we will discuss the opto-electronic properties of Ge and Ge/GeSn core/shell NWs grown in a CVD reactor using a Ge or Si (111) substrate. The structural properties of the NWs were evaluated by combining Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Atom Probe Tomography (APT) in order to understand the nanowire growth direction, crystalline properties as well as Sn distribution uniformity in the shell of the nanowires. Photoluminescence, absorption and Raman measurements will elucidate the effect of strain on the MIR direct bandgap emission/absorption of the GeSn shell. Finally, wewill discuss the electrical characterization of individual Ge and GeSn NW photodetectors. Our devices are fabricated by Electro-Beam Photolithography (EBL) based on metal-semiconductor-metal (M-S-M) structure to address the dependence of the photocurrent under illumination at different SWIR-MIR wavelengths. The time response and transport properties of Ge and Ge/GeSn core/shell NW Field Effect Transistor (FET) in back-gated structure are compared with their counterparts of conventional thin film heterostructures. References Pilon, FT Armand, et al. "Lasing in strained germanium microbridges." Nature communications1 (2019): 1-8. Assali, S., J. Nicolas, and O. Moutanabbir. "Enhanced Sn incorporation in GeSn epitaxial semiconductors via strain relaxation." Journal of Applied Physics2 (2019): 025304. Assali, S., et al. "Atomically uniform Sn-rich GeSn semiconductors with 3.0–3.5 μ m room-temperature optical emission." Applied Physics Letters25 (2018): 251903. Assali, S., et al. "Growth and optical properties of direct band gap Ge/Ge0. 87Sn0. 13 core/shell nanowire arrays." Nano letters3 (2017): 1538-1544.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207