MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024611078 · doi:10.11575/prism/37832

Development of a Clinical Care Pathway for Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Emergency Department

2020· dissertation· en· W3024611078 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Connor M. O’Rielly

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Innovates
KeywordsEmergency departmentMedicineAcute coronary syndromeEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineMedical emergencyInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chest pain is a predominant reason for emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations in Canada. ED physicians use diagnostic tools (e.g., biomarkers) to identify patients with myocardial infarction (MI) requiring intervention, and prognostic tools (e.g., risk scores) to determine which patients without MI are eligible for discharge. While clinical guidelines recommend that these two portions of the assessment occur sequentially, the evidence for each has emerged in isolation. There is also a paucity of evidence on risk score use in the era of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays, adverse event risk factors for patients without MI, and appropriate timelines for follow-up. This project had three complimentary objectives: (1) Synthesize available evidence on prognostic prediction score performance when hs-cTn assays are incorporated; (2) Quantify the time course of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients without index MI and identify characteristics with potential predictive value for MACE, and; (3) Develop a sequential clinical pathway for the assessment of chest pain in the ED and measure the impacts on diagnostic and prognostic accuracy as well as ED patient flow. A systematic review was conducted to synthesize evidence on the chest pain risk scores to be prioritized for integration into the clinical pathway. A time-to-event analysis was then conducted to measure timing of MACE in patients without index MI, as well as a stratified analysis to identify characteristics with predictive value for 30-day MACE to be used in the pathway for clinical stratification. Trial clinical pathways were developed and quantitatively compared. Pathways combined a validated 2-hour hs-cTn diagnostic algorithm with variable clinical pre-stratification, risk score types, and low-risk cut-offs. A sequential clinical pathway using a validated hs-cTn algorithm and the HEART score can identify nearly 40% of ED chest pain patients as eligible for discharge without the need for further testing with no missed MI or 30-day MACE. This thesis project contributed evidence necessary for the updating and advancing of the ED chest pain assessment and presents an evidence-based sequential clinical pathway that maximizes the efficiency of the ED chest pain assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.238
GPT teacher head0.515
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207