Organizational Justice and Its Impact on Organizational Commitment in the General Administration of Customs in the State of Kuwait
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to identify organizational justice and its impact on organizational commitment in the General Administration of Customs in the State of Kuwait.      The study population consists of workers in the General Administration of Customs in the State of Kuwait, who are (5000) employees. An appropriate sample of 150 people was drawn to distribute the study questionnaire to them, and 111 questionnaires valid for analysis were retrieved. It is found that there is statistically significant effect at the level of significance (α≤0.05) for organizational justice with its combined dimensions (Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice and Interactional Justice) on the organizational commitment in the General Administration of Customs in the State of Kuwait. According to these results the researcher suggested: - The necessity of senior management commitment to the dimensions of organizational justice in order to raise the level of job commitment to the highest degree.- Because there is a relationship between justice and commitment and being direct, therefore, it can be strengthened by showing the interest of different departments in strengthening the values of justice by satisfying the needs and desires of workers and reducing obstacles and obstacles impeding the achievement of their goals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".